home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1995
/
0295.doc
/
000356_owner-lightwave-l _Fri Feb 17 22:36:14 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-03-19
|
2KB
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by netcom21.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id VAA09656; Fri, 17 Feb 1995 21:32:01 -0800
Received: from hafgan-fddi.jpl.nasa.gov by netcom9.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
id NAA27353; Fri, 17 Feb 1995 13:46:13 -0800
From: Enrique.A.Gamez@ccmail.jpl.nasa.gov
Received: from danea-fddi.jpl.nasa.gov by hafgan.jpl.nasa.gov; Fri, 17 Feb 95 13:46:10 -0700
Received: by danea.jpl.nasa.gov (5.x/SMI-SVR4+DXRs2.3+GKEs1.0)
id AA28758; Fri, 17 Feb 1995 13:46:02 -0800
Received: by danea from ccmail.Jpl.Nasa.Gov
id <950217134601.CC4464447@CCMail.Jpl.Nasa.Gov> with CCTORFC Fri Feb 17 13:46:01 1995
Message-Id: <950217134601.CC4464447@CCMail.Jpl.Nasa.Gov>
Date: 17 Feb 95 13:41:00 -0000
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com, dnakakihara@BIX.com
Subject: Re: Not Perfectly Clear!
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: bulk
Hi Doug, how's SFVAUG?
re: your Q.
This may be obvious, but why not use a morph target of the bar that
you're trying to "grow". Or, you could have a polygon which is
originally covering the bar...slowly move away, thereby revealing it.
This covering poly would need to be image mapped with the background
so that it appears invisible.
-Enrique.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Not Perfectly Clear!
Author: dnakakihara@BIX.com at Internet
Date: 2/17/95 11:05 AM
I am trying to make a line on a bar graph slowly appear from left to right. I
figured a transparency image map sequence would do the trick, but it seems
like I can never make the object *totally* transparent. There is always a
faint outline of it. I've even tried it with no image map and just 100%
transparency. However, if I set transparency to 200%, the object is totally
gone. My questions are: 1) how do I animate my bar graph?, and 2) why isn't
100% transparency 100% invisible?
--Doug